Solvere

20121219 How Temasek can become Key to Singapore Success http://bettersingapore.blogspot.sg/2012/12/20121219-how-temasek-can-become-key-to.html When Engineers chase for Profit, without improving efficiency and capability, lose, great losses will be the outcome. 2000 when i informed a respected Engineer that this person will lead Temasek, it was with greater picture than profit making. Profit making, GDP are easy to manipulate, Bankers just demonstrated to us through their inventions of derivatives. We also recently raised the rent of $1(set by Colony Master) to $1,000,000(our people government)  for a Hospital run by Charity, (even though they need not pay $1,000,000 through subsidies). This showed as government, presenting rosy picture is not difficult, even if the nation is bleeding. I find it is my duty to inform the people of Singapore, especially the elected and the fourth Prime Minister of the Republic to stop our nation from multiplying,  accelerating, aggrava...

20121210 How Lui can be the FIRST successful Transport Minister http://bettersingapore.blogspot.sg/2012/12/20121210-how-lui-can-be-first.html An important note to protect the Ministers & MPs,  You commented on where to get money to pay bus drivers did Law Minister advise you what you said may  1. Affect the charges against the drivers  2. You may then be called to witness 3. Drivers may have legitimate claims beyond the SMRT! Concisely This discussed in the following: 1. We do not need bigger transport system 2. Money can easily come by  3. To be Really Successful 4. Be World Model - our Next Export 5. For Minister of Finance (relevant to Hardware n new Software Ministers) Introduction Most of the transport ministers stepped down, except Mah Pow Tan took up a bigger porfolio MND.  Transport is a key for modern economy, therefore, transport success will enable economic success. ...

20121204En Solvere public apology to the Chinese Drivers http://bettersingapore.blogspot.sg/2012/12/20121204en-solverel-public-apology-to.html Solvere formally apologize to the 1.3 Billion Chinese for Solvere has recommended to his beloved Prime Minister about $1,000 income will be for Singapore mass for a nation without producing own food, own actors, own goods to compete in the world. Reducing cost to improve our competitive edge is the recommendation. However, it is not Solvere intention, expectation, imagination that increasing the low income is a solutions. 20110419 Save Singapore Housing - 3 Technology http://bettersingapore.blogspot.com/2011/04/20110419-save-singapore-without-mah-3.html Technology has been shared with Minister MND, Khaw Boon Wan. I am thankful he replied in his face book that MOS Lee Yi Shyan will act on it. As i am not yet abandon my duty and emigrate, not yet a foreign talent, therefore, i am yet to hear from MOS Lee, a year has...

20121204 康索向中国车长的公开道歉 http://bettersingapore.blogspot.sg/2012/12/20121204.html 1. 在新加坡的中国公交车车长百人集体不上班，一些被控告，二十多人被遣送回国。 2. 这是新加坡政府大幅度提高$1,000元底薪工人的薪水但没有相应提高中国人的薪水。 3. 中国人不但觉得不公平，更觉得尊严受到伤害。而发生的， 没有动武，也没有 混乱。 4. 这提高$1,000也用在拥有公共组屋的最新考量。 5. 这都是在大选后提出来的。大选中，执政党受到人民的强力反对，怨声载道。一位部长指出， 人民悲伤，生气，唾弃。 （sad, angry, despise) 6. 这是大吹大擂开了赌场、方程式一跑车后，并没有提高新加坡人的技能、收入的必然施政的结果。 7. 大选前，康索指出了      7.1 牺牲了我国开国元勋的承诺，元勋承诺赌场绝对不可能在他有生之年开。      7.2 元勋晚年新的产业只有赌场和方程式一跑车。      7.3 他们没有带来增长，更没有提升国人的技能，国家在国际上的·竞争能力。      7.4 新加坡只有当承包商，低廉的劳工， $1,000是一个国际愿意还的价格。      7.5 我们必要设计基本住房给 $1,000 元 左右收入的老百姓。      7.6 康索一贯指出问题，必然是在有处方之后。      7.7 康索指出必要从科技和组屋房契上着手。      7.8 如何把房屋建得更好，更经济，更舒服的科技在 20110419 Save Singapore Housing - 3 Technology http://bettersingapore.blogspot.com/2011/04/20110419-save-singapore-without-mah-3.html      7 .9 康索也指出必要从组屋的房契，市场管理。他肯定不...

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/10009.pdf http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/hydraulics/pubs/10009/10009.pdf A frequently quoted statement of this law is: "... every landowner must bear the burden of receiving upon his land the surface water naturally falling upon land above it and naturally flowing to it therefrom, and he has the corresponding right to have the surface water naturally falling upon his land or naturally coming upon it, flow freely therefrom upon the lower land adjoining, as it would flow under natural conditions. From these rights and burdens, the principle follows that he has a lawful right to complain of others, who, by interfering with natural conditions, cause such surface water to be discharged in greater quantity or in a different manner upon his land, than would occur under natural conditions....." (Heier v. Krull. 160 Cal 441 (1911)) This rule is inherently strict, and as a result has been modified to so...